tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-70656937401692670432024-03-04T21:16:14.479-08:00Samhita ArniUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7065693740169267043.post-41650712867056447232014-02-10T23:16:00.000-08:002014-02-10T23:16:38.816-08:00<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i>THE
HINDUS</i></span><span style="font-size: small;"> Review by Samhita Arni</span></span><br />
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjijH_Qs_w8ojls0-NI9f7qh3bUD0rd_-qN737HwzzGJh0G4L0qVmPeg-yqNn_ByWWDblfg9mX26iPlsKCB4JmRZ4urKdLILCtwqP0AHa_BzK8gMjKH78E8lKjlirA5neLzkNN75EzokpE/s1600/The-Hindus-An-Alternative-Hi.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjijH_Qs_w8ojls0-NI9f7qh3bUD0rd_-qN737HwzzGJh0G4L0qVmPeg-yqNn_ByWWDblfg9mX26iPlsKCB4JmRZ4urKdLILCtwqP0AHa_BzK8gMjKH78E8lKjlirA5neLzkNN75EzokpE/s1600/The-Hindus-An-Alternative-Hi.jpg" /></span></a></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: small;">BOOK
REVIEWED</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: small;"><br />The
Hindus: An Alternative History</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: small;">By Wendy
Doniger</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: small;">Penguin,
2009</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: small;">Rs 999
Pages 779</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: small;">ISBN
9780670083541</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">The
</span><span style="font-size: small;"><i>Chandogya Upanishad</i></span><span style="font-size: small;">
recounts the creation of the world; it all began with a cosmic egg,
the text claims, that cracked in two. One half of this broken
eggshell formed the sky, and the other part the Earth. From the
egg-white came clouds, and from the yolk, mist. The veins in the egg
turned into rivers, and the fluid of the egg, the ocean. In the
</span><span style="font-size: small;"><i>Satapatha Brahmana, </i></span><span style="font-size: small;">the
creator, Prajapati, hatches from a golden egg.</span><span style="font-size: small;">
Eggs abound in creation myths across cultures – from the Greek
Orphic myths, to the Finnish </span><span style="font-size: small;"><i>Kallevala.</i></span><span style="font-size: small;">
Perhaps it is fitting and ironic that the story of how </span><span style="font-size: small;"><i>The
Hindus: An Alternative History</i></span><span style="font-size: small;"> came into
being also begins with an egg - an English egg thrown at an American
Academic, during a lecture in London in November 2003.</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"> Wendy
Doniger, the author of the Hindus, is possibly the most reputed
academic in the field of Hinduism today. In 2003, she was giving a
lecture at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS),
moderated by William Dalyrmple, when, in response to her comments on
the repressed sexuality of characters in the </span><span style="font-size: small;"><i>Ramayana</i></span><span style="font-size: small;">,
an audience member threw an egg at Doniger.</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"> An essay
written earlier, “Shadows of the Ramayana”seems to surmise the
contentious points of her lecture. The essay is brilliant and
incisive; more 'literary criticism' than anything else. In her
analysis, Doniger points out how characters like Surpanakaa and Sita
serve as foils to each other, how the relationship between Valin and
Surgriva articulates the tensions and potential threats that
underlie Ram's relationships with his brothers. She goes on to claim
that “the text suggests that Rama might fear his brother Lakshmana
might become another sort of double, that he could replace Rama in
bed with Sita. (107)” For devout Hindus, who perceive Ram as a God
and the Ramayana as a sacred text, only to be worshipped, such
readings are, no doubt, antagonizing. Doniger, after her lecture, was
attacked in the press and her internet for being sexually-titillating
and obsessed with sex. </span><span style="color: black;">Dalrymple,
writing later about the incident, noted also the the egg-throwing
faction not only criticized Doniger's work, but also questioned her
right, as a non-Hindu, to write about Hinduism.</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"> It's this
incident, Doniger claims in the preface to the Hindus, that spurred
her to write this book, which offers the reader an alternative to the
conventional and most widely-read narratives of Hinduism. </span>
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i> </i></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i>The
Hindus</i></span></span><span style="color: black;">
is significant in light of the ongoing debate about the various
versions of Indian 'history' available, and the 'right' to write
about India and Hinduism. Dalrymple, </span><span style="color: black;">in
an article titled "The War Over History" examined how
history has been politicized by the right and how anything that
represents an aberration from that perspective is attacked. He notes
that academics, in India and abroad, have been subjected to "hate
campaigns from Hindu extremists and the “cyber-nationalists” of
the Indian diaspora” and ends his article with a call for
“accessible, well-written and balanced histories of India.” The
existing histories, in his opinion, are scholarly works that do not
appeal to the general Indian reading public. The vacuum is filled
with the sort of 'unhistorical myths' (seen, most notably, in the
textbooks brought out a few years back during the BJP regime) that
present an artificial, constructed, airbrushed version of Indian
history at odds with historical evidence. In </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i>The
Hindus</i></span></span><span style="color: black;">
Doniger has attempted to answer Dalrymple's call and provide a
readable history of India and Hinduism that presents not just a
narrative alternative, but also de-constructs many of the popular,
unhistorical myths that have been circulated in the last fifty years.
</span>
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">In
contrast to the defined, dogmatic Hinduism of the Hindutva brigade,
Doniger's Hinduism is protean and eludes definition. She also
discusses the impossibility of clearly defining Hinduism and traces
the origins of the word 'hinduism' to it's geographical roots. As she
explains, </span><span style="font-size: small;">Hindus</span><span style="font-size: small;">,
in the first instance, are a geographically defined people. Thus,
Hinduism is an ill-fitting term, harbouring a multiplicity of faiths
and ideological stances, and only coming to mean, in colonial times,
a religion. Her scope is immense: she traces the development of key
themes - the treatment of animals, women, the concept of violence and
dharma - through the entire period of habitation on the Indian
sub-continent – from the time that Godwanaland crashed into Asia
and created the himalayas, to the present day.</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"> Hinduism,
Doniger claims, is not just about Brahmins, Vedas and Sanskrit –
it's also about women, lower-castes, pariahs, Buddhists, Jains,
Muslims and vernacular languages. Hinduism is presented as a constant
conversation between brahmins and pariahs, Sanskrit and vernacular
languages, the rulers and the marginalized. For example, the excesses
of Brahmins, ridiculed in vernacular languages, are eventually
articulated in Sanskrit, the 'brahmanical' language, in the </span><span style="font-size: small;"><i>Puranas</i></span><span style="font-size: small;">.</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;"> </span><span style="color: black;">I've
encountered some of these ideas in other places, particularly those
that deal with the interaction between Sanskrit and Vernacular
languages. AK Ramanujam (who was Doniger's colleague at the
University of Chicago) explained this dialogue in his essay (written
twenty years ago) “Where Mirrors are Windows” - </span>
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">“<span style="font-size: small;">...Cultural
traditions in India are indissolubly plural and often conflicting but
are organized through at least two principles, (a)
context-sensitivity and (b) reflexivity of various sorts, both of
which constantly generate new forms out of the old ones. What we call
Brahmanism, bhakti traditions, Buddhism, Jainism, tantra, tribal
traditions and folklore, and lastly, modernity itself, are the most
prominent of these systems. They are responses to previous and
surrounding traditions, they invert, subvert and convert their
neighbours.”</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;">In
short, Ramanujan's statement captures a large part of Doniger's
thesis. As Ramanujan himself says, this is suggesting “the
obvious.” </span>Towards
the end of this same essay, Ramanujan alludes to Doniger's early work
- <span style="font-size: small;"><i>Dreams,
Illusions and Other Realities</i></span>
(1984), just after noting that “Doubles, shadows, upside-down
reflections are common in Indian myth and story.”
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"> Doubles,
shadows and animals continue to haunt Doniger, and foreground her
analysis even in <span style="font-size: small;"><i>The
Hindus, </i></span>written
over twenty years after <span style="font-size: small;"><i>Dreams
etc</i></span>. In fact,
the double vision emerges as the metaphor Doniger uses for her
understanding of the multiple meanings, interpretations and
perspectives that proliferate in Hinduism. The double takes various
forms in Doniger's book. In her preface, she alludes to the shapes of
lunar craters – to some these shadowy shapes on the surface of the
moon look like a man, to others a rabbit. The double metaphor
resurfaces in the 'paradox of mutual creation' – the myth of
Brahma and Vishnu mutually creating each other. Even the ritual of
sacrifice, which opens up 'homologies between the human world and
corresponding parts of the universe,' is an instance of
double-vision. And towards the end of her book, Kipling and his Kim
also emerge as instances of the double – Kipling is racist but not
racist; likewise Kim is Indian but not Indian, British but not
British.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"> Doniger's
metaphor of the double, also owes something to AK Ramanajan. She
alludes, repeatedly, to the description of Ramanujan's father,
developed in his essay “Is there an Indian Way of thinking.”
Ramanujan's father - a mathematician-astronomer and an astrologer
embodied many contradictions that seemed inconsistent, but led
Ramanujan to his understanding of how the 'Indian way of thinking, '
on account of it's context-sensitive approach, eschews idealization
and tolerates (even nourishes) contradiction.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;"> </span><span style="color: black;">For
many of us in India, the fact that Hinduism accommodates many
contradictions; warring impulses towards orthodoxy and iconoclasm; is
something we experience on a daily basis. Although demure, chaste
heroines like Sita and Savitri populate our mythic landscape, we also
encounter fiery, non-conformist figures like Draupadi and Kunthi.
Many of us, hearing the stories of Ekalvya, Amba-Sikhandin and Karna,
have felt troubled. Moreover, growing up in South India, one can't
help encountering more recent subversive takes on traditional tales –
DMK-founder E.V. Ramaswami's </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i>Kemmayana</i></span></span><span style="color: black;">
features Ravana as the hero. </span>
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;"> </span>Even
the creation hymn in the Rig-veda, subtly subversive and veering
towards agnosticism, is a text many might be familiar with -
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">Who
really knows?</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">Who
will here proclaim it?</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">Whence
was it produced?</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">Whence
is this creation?</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">The
gods came afterwards, with the creation of this universe.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">Who
then knows whence it has arisen?</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">Whence
this creation has arisen</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">–
<span style="font-size: small;">perhaps it formed itself, or perhaps it did not –</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">the
One who looks down on it,</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">in
the highest heaven, only He knows</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">or
perhaps He does not know.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">(Wendy
Doniger O'Flaherty, <span style="font-size: small;"><i>The
Rig Veda: An Anthology,</i></span>
25-26)</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;">Consequently,
many of Doniger's ideas, coming to those of us who live in India, may
not hold too many surprises. With readers like myself (and there are
quite a few - even you, dear reader, may be one) Doniger is
preaching to the choir. Yet she has chosen to frame her work by the
debate that surrounds Hinduism and history. Perhaps Doniger's work is
best seen a sort of </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i>apologia
- </i></span></span><span style="color: black;">written to
defend her work, her analysis and her right to write about Hinduism.
But who is Doniger writing for? </span>
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;">Earlier
this year, I had the opportunity to listen to Wendy Doniger discuss
the soon-to-be-released </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i>The
Hindus</i></span></span><span style="color: black;"> at the
Jaipur Literature Festival. The hall was half-filled, the audience
listened to Doniger respectfully and attentively. Questions were
asked – some that did challenge Doniger's interpretations – but
the tone was always polite and courteous, </span>even
though right-wing ideologues like Tarun Vijay and Swapan Dasgupta
were reportedly roaming the grounds of the venue<span style="color: black;">.
There were, remarkably, no eggs thrown.</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;"> </span><span style="color: black;">Did
Doniger tone down her content? It's possible. But I also suspect that
an Indian audience, in some ways, is far less hostile and defensive
than the diaspora. Ashis Nandy, commenting on the failure of the BJP
in the general elections, used the term 'laptop hinduism' to describe
the ideology of the Hindutva brigade. He meant a cut-and-paste sort
of hinduism, easy to export, easy to carry – an identity in a box –
that appeals to those living outside India. Doniger too, notes in her
book, the affinity that Indian living in America have for Hindutva,
for a 'portable' identity and describes them as “cut-off..from the
full range of Hindus and Hinduisms that they would experience in
India.” </span>
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;"> </span><span style="color: black;">Is
her book directed at those who do not experience the contradictions
and chaos of India on a daily basis – foreigners, wishing to learn
more about Hinduism, and, more importantly, the Hindu diaspora, with
their narrow, constructed ideas of Hinduism? </span>
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;">Whatever
her audience may be, some of her concepts are extremely intriguing.</span>
Her concept of the “three alliances” explains, in three steps the
evolution of Hindu society from a sacrifice-oriented society in Vedic
times (that zealously guarded the right to perform sacrifices and
access to texts) to one that valued ascetic and meditative power, and
finally developing into a society where devotion (Bhakthi) is supreme
(and knowledge and the right to worship are open to all through
temple iconography and domestic <span style="font-size: small;"><i>pujas</i></span>).
She also frames the epics with a historical context that illuminates
the concerns that shaped each work. Thus, the <span style="font-size: small;"><i>Ramayana</i></span>,
composed during a time of political instability in India, when
numerous dynasties rose and fell, not only favors a monarchic system
but is clearly concerned with the idea of legitimate male succession
and the 'ideal' monarch. In the case of the <span style="font-size: small;"><i>Mahabharata,
</i></span>concerned with
dharma and the terrible violence of war, she discerns the influence
of Kalinga, Asoka and Buddhism. Even Doniger's egg-hurling
detractors, who would feel uncomfortable at the idea of a non-Hindu
writing about Hinduism, I think, could be won over by her nuanced,
sensitive discussion of suttee. Her argument that the treatment of
animals in texts and myths reflect the concerns and attitudes of the
caste-system is insightful, and her elucidation of the tripartite
paradigm (to support this idea), where the Cow-Horse-Dog hierarchy
reflects that of the
Brahmin/Sacred-Kshatriya/Warrior-Pariah/Outsider, brilliant.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;"> Nonetheless,
the wide scope</span><span style="color: black;">
of this work sometimes intrudes on and hinders the development of her
ideas. As this book aims to be a history, she is duty bound to
provide a historical background to the events and texts that she
refers to. However, in doing so, she often risks losing the reader.
For example, her exploration of the Indus Valley Civilization
(Chapter 2) is vast and detailed – but she concludes that the
Indus Valley Civilization may or may not have contributed to
Hinduism. (At which point, I couldn't help wondering – what was
the point of the last twenty pages?) In another instance – the
historical background provided seems insufficient -The South makes an
appearance for the first time rather late in chapter thirteen (on
Bhakthi) -what was happening in the South during the events discussed
in the preceding twelve chapters? </span>
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;"> Perhaps
it is unfair to criticize Doniger for being too lengthy in one
situation and brief in another – but the intensity and the force of
her arguments is definitely reduced when interrupted by lengthy
summaries of historical background. The idea of an alternative
history, promised in the introduction, led me to expect that women
would be the main </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i>drammatis
personnae</i></span></span><span style="color: black;">
of Doniger's account, but I was disappointed - there were far less
women than I expected. Very few female authors are mentioned –
there's a passing mention of Gargi, and it's only when we come to the
section on Bhakthi that Doniger mentions other women poets. Yet, as a
woman, I'm well aware of the fact that women often author their own
subversive versions of stories and events. Nabaneeta Dev Sen, in her
article on “Women Retelling the Ramayana” refers to two sixteenth
century female poets – the Bengali Chandrabhati and the Telegu
Molla. There must be others. Why are they all missing from this
'alternative history'?</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: red;"> </span><span style="color: black;">Many
ideas and questions tantalizingly alluded to, but remain unexplored.
The myths of villainous brahmin-demons, such as Vrta and Ravana, are
brought up more than once in this book. But after the discussion of
the “brahmin imaginary” and the intellectual power wielded by the
highest caste, one can't help wondering exactly why these demons are
depicted as brahmins, particularly in brahmanical texts. Is this a
subversive streak? Doniger doesn't explain or explore. </span>
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;">Hinduism,
in </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i>The Hindus</i></span></span><span style="color: black;">,
emerges as a space for competing ideologies and ideas. Through debate
and conversation, Hinduism has evolved and developed. Doniger traces
how ideas, at first subversive and alternative, challenge the
dominant order of the day. But these ideas and concepts are soon
co-opted into the mainstream and become part of the same dominant
order. For example, the Bhakthi movement was (originally)
revolutionary and inclusive, involving pariahs and women - those
ostracised from the dominant order. Yet while reading Doniger's book,
one realizes that the Bhakthi movement (in combination with many
other factors) have shaped the the Ram-centric, exclusive ideology of
the RSS and it's Hindutva associates.</span></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;"> Hinduism
defies definition and is open to debate because it's constantly
changing, partly in response to such debate. It isn't static. In the
past debates weren't fought just in intellectual spaces and stories,
but on battlefields. Maiming (in sectarian Vaishnava-Shaiva feuds),
death and war were, on occasion, part of this conversation. </span>
</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="color: black; font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;"> Although
maiming (and it's less violent cousin - egg-throwing) is </span>definitely<span style="color: black;">
to be decried, Doniger's books provokes the realization that the
spirit of argument is essential to Hinduism. The latest avatar of
this debate features Doniger and the egg-throwers. Debate is
important. Perhaps for this reason alone – the fact that such a
debate (or conversation or 'war' – whatever term you choose) exists
at present should be celebrated. </span>Without
debate - without either side - Hinduism would be just a term, and
not a living tradition.</span></div>
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="color: red; font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<br />
<div class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="color: red; font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">A <a href="http://www.samarni.com/pdfs/The%20Hindus_Caravan_december%202009.pdf">slightly different version of this review</a> appeared in<i> Caravan Magazine in </i>December 2009.</span></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7065693740169267043.post-7495819431267288912012-08-07T02:43:00.000-07:002012-08-07T02:43:09.724-07:00<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;">
<a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0Bw-N-MVCUKbAWnc3azJIMWhsNEE">"Symbols of Prestige",</a> a piece in the first (July) issue of Nat Geo Traveller India that starts off at Thanjavur and brings together my three great, all-consuming passions - my aunts, Chola temples and the Ramayana. Thanks are owed to Niloufer and NGT for giving me the freedom to write this slightly crazy, all-over-the-place piece. </div>
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7065693740169267043.post-78638302360804876142012-07-25T13:18:00.002-07:002012-07-25T13:21:53.452-07:00WHAT PROOFREADING CAN DO TO YOU<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"></span><br />
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">LOVE SONG OF A PROOF READER </span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">Or, What Proofreading At 1 Am Can Do To You.</span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i>Dedicated to a Bracket-that-was. </i></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">Single bracket, you stand there at the end of a phrase, lurking by the round side of a full-stop. You are lonely. There is no opening bracket to stand guard and ward off the chill of an exposed clause. </span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">It's cold. You bend. You crouch, trying hard to curl into yourself --into a round period like the one that slumbers blissfully by you. You'd have better chance of passing unnoticed. Maybe you'd pass as part of an ellipsis and a third period would join you. Or the other full stop would get cut out.</span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">As you wait, uncertain, you wonder at the careless, ungrammatical hand that created you. Is there </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">truly </span></i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">no design or purpose to your existence? </span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">Single bracket, you pine. For another one that faces you from across the yawning clause and stands back to the preceding sentence. That blocks out the rest - the dashes that leer greedily at you; other paired brackets that scoff at you; commas and semi-colons that twitter; quotes that gossip and colons that gruffly face you.</span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">You wilt. You wish for another partner. To be part of a pair of brackets. To enclose, properly, a clause. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">To face each other across all eternity.</span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">It's then then you notice something else.</span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">Me.</span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">Staring at you. </span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">I hear the wind howling about me. The rain lashes down on my windowsill. The silent chill of an empty house creeps into the marrow of my bones. </span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">I know your pain. </span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">And for a moment, we face each other. Locked together in a tangle. </span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">Bracketed together. </span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">We're the same. </span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; min-height: 14px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">And then-</span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">A quick movement of my hand, a strike and -</span></div>
<div style="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">You're gone. </span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7065693740169267043.post-47293361434389462542012-03-30T11:30:00.006-07:002012-03-30T11:44:38.698-07:00Review: The Obliterary JournalThe Obliterary Journal Volume 1<br />Blaft Publications Pvt Ltd and Tranquebar Press<br />© Blaft Publications 2012<br />ISBN 978-93-81626-44-3<br />Rs 695<br />Pages 269<br /><br />I've never had to work out algebraic equations in order to review a book - but Somdutt Sarkar's explorations of the twelfth century mathematician Bhaskaracharya's text "Lilavati" in <span style="font-style:italic;">The Obliterary Journal</span> presents math problems that offer infinite imaginative possibilities – for example, the number of pearls that fall off a necklace as a couple makes love.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiEm1u2rCIQgR3y0Gi7fnDGwdRM_n3MldWxpH0OWk4AC6VsSiDc6vskprA1nRY6xgxa4hwgA3K6fRjZ2ZtmB18nsHt2IoXqorlWFIZGXXH9cHTWTHs48o5v5XkOIH5a1pbAeTPPRngkZso/s1600/Unknown-4"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 191px; height: 263px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiEm1u2rCIQgR3y0Gi7fnDGwdRM_n3MldWxpH0OWk4AC6VsSiDc6vskprA1nRY6xgxa4hwgA3K6fRjZ2ZtmB18nsHt2IoXqorlWFIZGXXH9cHTWTHs48o5v5XkOIH5a1pbAeTPPRngkZso/s320/Unknown-4" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5725760891264036594" /></a><br />It's this spirit of imagination and experimentation that this anthology revels in. <span style="font-style:italic;">The Obliterary Journal</span> is a compilation of miscellaneous visual material in a number of varying styles and forms - graphic short stories, collections of street art, and hand painted type. A one page visual piece, Farooq's "A Squid Vixen" - portrays a figure illustrated in the style of Amar Chitra Katha comics, with the head of a squid and an apsara-like body. "Squid Vixen" seems to suggest that stories are not necessarily full-fledged narratives, but are, for the compilers of this anthology, primarily ideas that present manifold imaginative possibilities. Another key concept - the conflict between visual and text is introduced in the form of a graphic short story in the foreword where pictograms and the written word face-off, with pictograms asserting the premise of this book; 'obliteracy' - to obliterate textual literature. <br /><br />Yet, in the pages that follow, the written word and the visual aren't always at odds. "The Nayagarh Incident" is worthy of special mention; a sci-fi tale featuring Transformer-like alien robots, and illustrated in the style of Patachitra scrolls (palm-leaf engravings from Orissa). Surprisingly, the odd combination isn't jarring. Similarly, Roney Devassia marries content with style in “Karuna Bhavanam,” a creative non-fiction piece based on interviews. Devassia's washed-out, grey-toned panels that blend into each other – is the perfect way to explore the fading, blurred memories of a group of elderly men living in an old-age home in Kozhikode. The excerpt from “The Hyderabad Graphic Novel”, by writer-artist duo Harsho Mohan Chattoraj and Jai Undurti is spectacular - not just because of Chattoraj's stunning, detailed black-and-white art, but also for Undurti's impressively researched, imaginative tale that ranges far across time, space and myth – featuring the mythic city of Aryan Vaejo, Egyptian Catacombs, Stonehenge, the Ice-Ages and Bal Gangadhar Tilak.<br /><br />Not all the pieces in <span style="font-style:italic;">The Obliterary Journal </span>work - "Nowhere to Run", an excerpt from Subrata Gangopadhyay's graphic novel in Bengali, centers on Janardhan, an anti-hero with superhuman strength, but offers a confusing narrative that contains too many characters and sub-plots. The textured, nebulous artwork of Amitabh Kumar's piece (which lacks a textual title, the title is visual - an airplane enclosed in a heart) is exquisite but the concept is too abstract to grasp – the piece begins with a goat claiming that “Airports make him nervous” and ends with the image of a smiley face drawn on a toilet. The collections of visual art from the streets "Autoraj" and "Street Art from Suriname" could benefit from more context. But these shortcomings don't detract from/mar the charm of this anthology - more than anything else, <span style="font-style:italic;">The Obliterary Journal</span>, by subverting and breaking with narrative conventions, challenges the way we think of stories, and uses the full capacity of the visual medium to blur the lines between (among other things) math and literature, the real and the imagined, fiction and non-fiction.<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;"><a href="http://www.tehelka.com/story_main52.asp?filename=hub070412Word.asp">A slightly different version of this review was published in Tehelka Magazine, Vol 9, Issue 14, 07 April 2012.</a><br /></span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7065693740169267043.post-75275857043237758442011-02-21T10:34:00.001-08:002011-02-21T10:34:46.068-08:00Under ConstructionMeanwhile, <br />visit <br />www.samarni.com<br /><br />Cheers!Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0